The 4 Most Unanswered Questions about

Facts About The Mcdonalds Case

The judicial system has been strengthened overtime because of the ability it has to become fair. The courts have to make sure that there are no disputes and that is why they tend to solve all of the case types that are brought before them. One case type that is really delicate is the personal injury ones and that is because they involve the personal injury. There are really no fixed penalties and most of the people tend to feel if they lose the case that the verdict was unfair. One such case that the people have been talking about for so long is one that involved a leading coffee company. The people read or hear about the coffee lawsuit where there is a woman who got to grow rich from compensation.

Apparently, the woman got coffee spilt on her lap and she was able to suffer some burns and she got heavily compensated for that. The argument that the lady was holding the coffee on her laps as she drove and therefore all of that compensation was unfair. We can be able to argue well with all the facts and also come to an understanding of why the company agreed to pay.

One of the facts that there is in this case is the other complaints that they had received from other clients about the same burns from their coffee. The chances for the defendant were slim for a win because of the many cases that there were against them.

There was a time that the company was able to admit to their coffee being too hot. The company served their coffee at a standard heat of 180 degrees compared to the market standard at 135 degrees. For the company, admitting liability made it hard for them and that is because such heat is known to cause deep burns.

The client should also be able to consider the fact that the lady was able to get some serious burns. The lady was hurt enough and the evidence is because there are medical records that show she was admitted and received medication for some time.

The other fact that should not be sidelined is the fact that the lady was old and was with her grandson at the time of the accident. In contrast to what many were led to believe, the lady was old and not in her middle ages. The lady sat in the passenger seat as the grandson drove and that is another fact. The personal injury lawyer that was chosen in this case was competent and argued with the facts and that is why they won the case.